Mary SciannaClick image to enlargeby Mary Scianna

 

By the time you read this, we will have elected a federal government. And the likelihood is that whichever party is in power, R&D subsidies will continue to play a role in supporting business innovation.

Many are familiar with the Scientific Research and Experimental Development (SR&ED) tax incentive program and the Industrial Research Assistance Program (IRAP). Through these programs, manufacturers and other businesses receive support through subsidized research and development initiatives aimed at developing and commercializing innovative technologies.

Companies of all sizes can reap the benefits of the subsidies, but one economist is suggesting that R&D performed by smaller firms should be subsidized less than R&D
by larger firms.

John Lester, a senior research associate at the Centre for the Study of Living Standards and a former federal government economist, makes this suggestion in an August 7, 2019 Globe and Mail article, commenting on the federal government’s innovation policy report.

One of the benefits of government R&D subsidies is the “spillover” effect – “some of the knowledge created while performing R&D inevitably leaks out or spills over to other firms, which allows them to reduce production costs or to improve their products and services.”

Lester goes on to say that the centre’s research finds that small companies generate fewer spillovers than larger firms, but that this is not the only consideration for deciding how much to subsidize R&D performed by small companies. 

“…subsidizing R&D performed by small companies at a high rate is contributing to the problems of commercializing inventions and scaling up companies identified in the innovation report,” says Lester.

He suggests that governments should adopt a common federal-provincial SR&ED subsidy rate to rebalance subsidies for both small and larger firms.

Lester is not the first to suggest rebalancing subsidies to support and generate more innovation, but is it the right approach? Would this approach punish smaller firms developing interesting technologies with less support from government subsidies? And is it a fair assesssment to compare "spillover" effects from larger businesses to smaller ones given that larger business entities, by their size alone, would naturally have a wider sphere of influence in this area?

Innovation is an essential component of a successful knowledge-based economy and governments have an important role to play in helping to create more competitive businesses in Canada. I'm not convinced that Lester's approach is the right one. What do you think? Let us know and we'll publish your comments in the next issue of this magazine. SMT

Fabricating: Boosting Efficiencies at Laser Speed

Noelle Stapinsky

Innovation drives growth, but having the right tools on the shop floor keeps that momentum rolling and production flowing

Shop talk - Apprenticeship training

Do you welcome apprentices from apprenticeship training programs in your shop? Why or why not?

Quick-change tooling advantages

by Thomas Mittmann

Driven tools with quick-change systems save money upfront, and long term

This watch is made from melted down guns

The Humanium Project uses metal from melted guns to make watches - and to bring attention to the global problem of armed violence.

FIELD NOTES: CoroDrill 870 with PL geometry

Supplier: Sandvik Coromant

End User: Henry Technologies

The future of space: Off-world manufacturing

Physicist, engineer and CEO Rob Hoyt delves into the challenges and potential of manufacturing and assembling large systems and structures in space to support exploration and colonization.

Embracing narcissism

Blanket statements can get you into trouble sometimes because there are always exceptions to the rule, but I'll go ahead and make one now: we live in an increasingly narcissistic society.

Global manufacturing expertise

by Steve Rodgers

Canadian automotive suppliers gaining international respect

One of the recognized truisms of the Canadian automotive industry is that from a manufacturing perspective, we have long punched above our economic weight.

Multi-axis turning-milling machine in action

The Chevalier FNL 220LSY multi-axis turning-milling machine in action. The machine, available in Canada from Heinman Machinery, can turn and mill complex parts in a single machine.

Is the internet of things working for manufacturers?

I met a manufacturer recently who didn’t have a web site for his company, nor was he set up on any social media sites to promote his business.

3D Inspection: Remote Control

by Noelle Stapinsky

Moving automated 3D inspection technology to the shop floor boosts throughput with faster quality control

New generation turret punch press

Prima Power's Punch Genius is a new generation of servo-electric punching systems with numerically controlled, servo-electric axes.

Why Aren’t Businesses Investing in Canada?

If you were to grade business investment in Canada in the past 17 years, the country would get a D.

Simulating Five

No matter how easy to operate, few would argue that five axis machining centres are more prone to tool and fixture interference than those limited to three axis work.

Stay In Touch

twitter facebook linkedIn